Pedestal VS Devuan GNU+Linux

I started playing with pedestal to create Clojure micro services. Coming from the Nodejs world, and Clojure being a REPL driven development language, I naturally expected to have watch for code changes and reload without having to restart the server. I searched around and found solutions, but I couldn't get it to work trivially. This guide is meant to serve as a step-by-step guide to achieve this. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Also http://pedestal.io/ is a good alternative with async middleware support out of the box. I tried both (for pet projects) and liked pedestal more. Source: over 2 years ago

I'm a new user with first install. Are there any user guides / admin guides available? I'm not seeing much documentation available at devuan.org -- maybe my eyes glaze over(?). Source: about 1 year ago

If Canonical spin a variant without systemd, possibly choosing Devuan as the base, it'll be great. Possibly, less resource hungry. Source: over 2 years ago

Trisquel's FAQ says: > Why should I use Trisquel instead of one of the better-known distributions? > There are literally hundreds of GNU/Linux distributions designed to fill every conceivable niche. Only a handful of them are entirely free software; Trisquel is one such distribution. ... But I disagree. Trisquel is based on ubuntu, and uses systemd. Not just as some optional init system you can remove -... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

If you're experienced, look at Devuan Chimaera. BTW, I always felt Gnome is the most productive work environment with that UI. I think Cinnamon may come close. Source: over 2 years ago

A Devuan basic installation with a lightweight desktop will work. Source: over 2 years ago