Software Alternatives & Reviews

Parcel VS JavaScript Obfuscator

Compare Parcel VS JavaScript Obfuscator and see what are their differences

Parcel logo Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

JavaScript Obfuscator logo JavaScript Obfuscator

JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.
  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13
  • JavaScript Obfuscator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Parcel

Categories
  • Web Application Bundler
  • Assets Bundler
  • JS Build Tools
  • Shipping and Tracking
Website parceljs.org
Details $

JavaScript Obfuscator

Categories
  • Web Application Bundler
  • Tool
  • Monitoring Tools
  • File Management
Website obfuscator.io
Details $

Parcel videos

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

More videos:

  • Review - PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW
  • Review - Le Parcel Box review

JavaScript Obfuscator videos

No JavaScript Obfuscator videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parcel and JavaScript Obfuscator)
Web Application Bundler
74 74%
26% 26
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100
Assets Bundler
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Parcel and JavaScript Obfuscator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Parcel and JavaScript Obfuscator

Parcel Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

JavaScript Obfuscator Reviews

We have no reviews of JavaScript Obfuscator yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Parcel should be more popular than JavaScript Obfuscator. It has been mentiond 100 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parcel mentions (100)

  • React Server Components Example with Next.js
    In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building Node.js applications without dependencies
    I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • 11 Ways to Optimize Your Website
    Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know
    In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

JavaScript Obfuscator mentions (26)

  • Need ideas with modding TCOAAL
    I don't need/use IDA, Nemlei just used https://obfuscator.io/, which just obfuscates the crap out of the code using various known methods (which I won't go into detail, it's public knowledge) and an un-obfuscation was cooked up by others. The one fucked-up thing the website does is randomizing function names, it just changes every variable/function name. We can't "un-obfuscate" those, so it's up to our brains to... Source: 5 months ago
  • How do human read code like this
    It's to purposefully makes your code harder to read so it prevents people from stealing your work. Here's a tool that does it: https://obfuscator.io/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • TIL you can de-obfuscate code with ChatGPT
    I just tested it on a little snippet of my code obfuscated with https://obfuscator.io/ and it worked seemingly perfectly. My original code:
      function resizeImage(img) {.
    - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Reverse Engineering TikTok's VM Obfuscation (Part 2)
    Https://obfuscator.io/ produces a similar result, perhaps that's all they used. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Reverse Engineering Tiktok's VM Obfuscation (Part 1)
    The obfuscation looks very similar to what you might get from https://obfuscator.io/. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parcel and JavaScript Obfuscator, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+

17track - All-in-one package tracking

UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

YUI Compressor - Yahoo JS/CSS Compressor