OmegaT VS Lokalise

Alternatively, you can try OmegaT which is free and runs locally, but it's not as user-friendly as other CAT tools and lacks many of the bells and whistles: http://omegat.org/. Source: 10 months ago

OmegaT is a free CAT tool that runs on all operating systems. It uses a unique interface which does not follow industry standards, but some translators prefer it, so it's worth giving it a look. It also includes a built-in interface to Google Translate so you can use that from within the program. Source: over 1 year ago

My only desires are unreasonable for a first project. A GUI for the translate toolkit tools, OmegaT in Qt instead of its ugly UI, Manuskript in C++ or QML, or even just maintaining it properly (it crashes way too much for me to write anything). Source: about 2 years ago

There are usually a lot of repeated sentences in formal documents so memory bank-based translation tools really help to translate faster (you're being paid by translated page usually, so it's in your best interest to do it fast). You can check OmegaT: https://omegat.org/ which is free. Paid software is very similar but more convenient. Source: over 2 years ago

OmegaT is the only professional CAT on the market that also grants you full freedom to use (GPL licence). Https://omegat.org. Source: over 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure, you'll find companies like this one which provide a nice GUI for helping with l10n or this one which offers translation services or this page that offers to convert between different formats, one of which probably has a nice GUI tool. Found them by 20 secs of googling. Source: 11 months ago

Localise has no problem reading the json files or export to json, we recently started using it in collaboration with external translators. Source: 12 months ago

Actually I don't have "my" app. But in our app we use https://lokalise.com/ to localize it even to Norwegian. Our team is not the most expensive company in the world btw. And we don't have 1B+ users all over the world. Source: about 1 year ago

Internationalization (i18n) pain for a documentation project is a process problem, not a feature gap. Documentation frameworks are not meant to translate your developer docs for you into the language of your choice. Some frameworks might offer i18n support, like the Crowdin support in Docusauraus v2. With Jekyll, you have to pick a theme like this one. I doubt if the reST or adoc frameworks would differ much from... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I've been thinking about building a micro saas very similar to this after having so many issues coordinating the localization of several products I manage. The only robust options in the market are incredibly expensive (for example https://lokalise.com/). Source: over 1 year ago