Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | nuxtjs.org |
Details $ | - |
Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | jekyllrb.com |
Details $ |
Jekyll might be a bit more popular than Nuxt.js. We know about 180 links to it since March 2021 and only 149 links to Nuxt.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In recent years, projects like Vercel's NextJS and Gatsby have garnered acclaim and higher and higher usage numbers. Not only that, but their core concepts of Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG) have been seen in other projects and frameworks such as Angular Universal, ScullyIO, and NuxtJS. Why is that? What is SSR and SSG? How can I use these concepts in my applications? - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
One reason to opt for server side rendering is improved SEO, so if this is especially import for your project you could have a look at for instance https://remix.run/ or https://nextjs.org/ for react or https://nuxtjs.org/ if you use Vue. Source: 10 months ago
Well nuxtjs.org work smooth on ios 12, maybe you didn't understand what I'm talking about. Source: 11 months ago
E.g. Most nuxtjs.org documentation is Nuxt 2 and therefore Vue 2, while nuxt.com documentation is always Nuxt 3 and therefore Vue 3. Source: 11 months ago
For detailed explanation on how things work, check out the documentation. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.