Software Alternatives & Reviews

NSQ VS IBM MQ

Compare NSQ VS IBM MQ and see what are their differences

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.

IBM MQ logo IBM MQ

IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07
  • IBM MQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03

NSQ videos

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

IBM MQ videos

IBM MQ Clustering - Tom Dunlap

More videos:

  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform - 2019 Review - All You Need to Know
  • Review - IBM Blockchain Platform Community Call – Next Generation Platform Tour + Q&A
  • Review - IBM MQ V9 Open Source Monitoring
  • Review - The next generation of the IBM Blockchain Platform

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NSQ and IBM MQ)
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Data Integration
22 22%
78% 78
Web Service Automation
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using NSQ and IBM MQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NSQ and IBM MQ

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

IBM MQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
IBM MQ is one of the best Kafka Alternatives which has an easy-to-use Interface and High Reliability and Data Security. It also facilitates the interoperability between various applications, either within or outside the organization. IBM MQ allows developers to focus on critical issues and manage any changes to transaction volumes asynchronously due to its simple structure.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
IBM MQ is an official message middleware which shortens the integration of varied applications and data spread throughout numerous platforms. It employs a message queue to share the info and offers a distinct messaging service for cloud systems, IoT gadgets, and mobile environments. By linking every element virtually from modest device to most complicated industrial...
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
IBM MQ is an easily usable interface with a great deal of reliability and security. Support is readily available in case needed anytime. It looks at handling the interoperability between various applications, be it within the organization or outside. It has asynchronous competencies and offers message integrity and relentless delivery. Because of its simplistic nature, it...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NSQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

IBM MQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM MQ yet. Tracking of IBM MQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NSQ and IBM MQ, you can also consider the following products

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Ethereum - Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Hyperledger - Hyperledger is a multi-project open source collaborative effort hosted by The Linux Foundation, created to advance cross-industry blockchain technologies.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.