Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ninja Build VS Meson

Compare Ninja Build VS Meson and see what are their differences

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Meson logo Meson

Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Meson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04

Ninja Build

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • JS Build Tools
  • Package Manager
Website ninja-build.org
Details $

Meson

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • JS Build Tools
  • Package Manager
Website mesonbuild.com
Details $

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Meson videos

Meson RTA by Newgen Vape - Flavour Banger - Review & Rebuild

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MESON RTA by NEWGEN - Review & Build Tutorial!
  • Review - NewGen Vape Meson RTA Review - ...it's all down to the price...

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Meson)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
53 53%
47% 47
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Meson. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Meson should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentiond 43 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 9 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

Meson mentions (43)

  • Rust Without Crates.io
    I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Makefile Tutorial
    Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • CMake x make?
    If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: 7 months ago
  • C++ Papercuts
    I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted):
        https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
    - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A Modern C Development Environment
    > C's only REAL problem (in my opinion) which is the lack of dependency management. Most everything else can be done with a makefile and a half decent editor. Care to hear about our lord and saviour Meson? Both of your quoted problems are mutually incompatible: dependency management isn't the job of the compiler, it's a job for the build or host system. If you want to keep writing makefiles, be prepared to write... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Meson, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Apache Maven - Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.

Buck - A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook