Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ninja Build VS Autoconf

Compare Ninja Build VS Autoconf and see what are their differences

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Autoconf logo Autoconf

GNU Autoconf is a tool for producing configure scripts for building, installing and packaging...
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Autoconf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

Ninja Build

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • JS Build Tools
  • Package Manager
Website ninja-build.org
Details $

Autoconf

Categories
  • Front End Package Manager
  • JavaScript Package Manager
  • Continuous Integration
  • JS Build Tools
Website gnu.org
Details $-

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Autoconf videos

No Autoconf videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Autoconf)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
78 78%
22% 22
Continuous Integration
79 79%
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Autoconf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

Autoconf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Autoconf yet. Tracking of Autoconf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Autoconf, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Buck - A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..