Nethogs VS iperf

I'm not sure how it works beyond that it reads /proc, but whatever it does it uses a whole lot more compute than nethogs does (which also displays per process and also uses /proc as the information source). This is fine for most of my machines, but for lower-specced machines I'll probably have to stick with nethogs[1] [1]: https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Nethogs(rpm) is a much simpler solution. It's also available on the repos. Source: over 1 year ago

Ngrep is ok, I just use nethogs, nmap and tcpick, and tcpdump with termshark for most network analysis. Source: over 1 year ago

Hello. I'm running linux mint at the moment. And I use a program that check the network sometimes that's called nethogs. https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. Source: almost 3 years ago

I think nethogs might do this if I'm looking at the screenshot properly. Bandwhich appears to show what's being connected to on a per-process basis. Source: about 3 years ago

Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago

Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago

File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago

I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago