Nanoc VS Qoppa PDF Studio

Nanoc Reviews

Qoppa PDF Studio Reviews

1. Michael Norbit    

   Own Boss at Idependent | 9 months ago
   Perfect to edit and sign PDF easily

   I was surprised to find a simple interface with all the features that I need to work with PDFs, I can edit and modify PDFs fast, with no problems at all

   🏁 Competitors: Adobe Acrobat DC, Nitro Pro

   👍 Pros:    Good price|Simple yet powerful and efficient tool|Digital signatures|Edit pdf|Easy merge of projects

   👎 Cons:    Limited trial version
2. Justin Toh    

   almost 2 years ago
   Excellent

   I have had an excellent experience with PDF Studio. There are a wide variety of features and the interface is intuitive and easy. Hands-down the best PDF editor I have used.

   👍 Pros:    Ease of use|Wast variety of features|Reasonable prices
3. ashishyt    

   almost 2 years ago
   Awesome PDF Editor

   PDF studio Pro is a fantastic product to create and edit your pdfs. It helped me transition from Windows to Linux as far as pdf editing is concerned. It has great features to enable the editing and annotating the pdfs. And unlike other paid and free software, it lets you import and export your settings to quickly restore your favorite layout of the product. To me this was one of the distinguishing features.

   🏁 Competitors: Master PDF Editor

Nanoc mentions (4)

• The Open Source Story - Open Sourcing RudderStack Blog and Docs

  When we decided to open-source our blog and docs, we were spoilt for choices. Today there are multiple well-supported and fully-featured frameworks for open-source content creation. Some of the options that we considered were Ghost, Jekyll, Hugo, Nanoc, and Gatsby. There are even more frameworks beyond these, and each tool has its pros and cons. Which one do we recommend? Well, we don’t. The best tool for you is... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• What do you use for public publishing your Zettlekasten?

  My websites use a static site generator, that means I have folders of Markdown files and they get converted by this program to HTML. (I'm using nanoc for nearly a decade, but other generators work fine. I like Ruby, so that's why I never tried any of the new JS stuff.) I don't just hit publish on my whole Zettelkasten, but that would work as well if you point your static site generator to your note archive. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Creating a minimalist blog with Jekyll Now

  Last time I was evaluating static site generators, Dimples and Nanoc both stood out for this recent-updates reason, among other personal criteria. https://github.com/waferbaby/dimples https://nanoc.ws/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• Something like Github pages but for a wiki?

  I've been looking for something like that for months and now I am pretty confident that such thing does not exist. You can try to bend existing SSG solution to be more wiki-like, but that's all. In that department, I have most success with Zola. But since you asked it in Ruby sub, have a look at Bridgetown or nanoc. Source: about 3 years ago

Qoppa PDF Studio mentions (0)