Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | mypy-lang.org |
Details $ |
Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | trunk.io |
Details $ | - |
No Trunk.io Check videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, mypy seems to be a lot more popular than Trunk.io Check. While we know about 48 links to mypy, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Trunk.io Check. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Mypy is "an optional static type checker for Python that aims to combine the benefits of dynamic (or "duck") typing and static typing". As Python is dynamically typed, Mypy adds an extra layer of safety by checking types at compile time (based on type annotations conforming to PEP 484), catching potential errors before runtime. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Mypy stands as an essential static type-checking tool. Its primary function is to verify the correctness of types in your codebase. However, manually annotating types in legacy code can be laborious and time-consuming. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Lua is a great language for embedding, but one thing I wish it had was some form of optional type annotations that could be checked by a linter. Something like mypy for Lua would be super-useful. Source: 11 months ago
Python is a dynamically typed language (unlike C or java which are statically typed) meaning that there's no enforcement on the type. This var ; type syntax is called Type Hints, and they are just that, merely hints. So they serve as a reminder to developers of what types of variables a function should receive and output, but they implement no real restrictions. So if you try to pass a string to collatz for... Source: 12 months ago
Mypy (https://mypy-lang.org/), the static type checker for python, so quite an important project in the python ecosystem. Source: about 1 year ago
Unfortunately, the best solution, according to this blog post, is, surprise, surprise, to subscribe to their product (which also encourages devs to embrace brain-dead practices like empty commit messages and squash-merges, which gives me little faith in their product, but I digress). So I guess those of us who can't or won't cough up a subscription fee are just hosed. Source: over 1 year ago
I would say any styleguide that is in prose form and not machine enforced is deficient. Modern linting and formatting tools are the best, most efficeiect means for enforcing style. No religious arguments are needed if the tooling decides what is correct. Shameless plug for https://trunk.io/products/check - which will handle universal enforcement of all the tooling for all of the pieces of your tech stack. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I actually recently joined a startup working on this problem! One of our products is a universal linter, which wraps the standard open-source tools available for the different toolchains, simplifies the setup/installation process for all of them, and a bunch of other usability things (suppressing existing issues so that you can introduce new linters with minimal pain, CI integration, and more): you can read more... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
PyLint - Pylint is a Python source code analyzer which looks for programming errors.
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
flake8 - A wrapper around Python tools to check the style and quality of Python code.
IntelliJ IDEA - Capable and Ergonomic IDE for JVM
PyFlakes - A simple program which checks Python source files for errors.
PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...