Software Alternatives & Reviews

MockServer VS Webhook.site

Compare MockServer VS Webhook.site and see what are their differences

MockServer logo MockServer

Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

Webhook.site logo Webhook.site

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
  • MockServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13
  • Webhook.site Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScript–a simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.

What are people using it for?

  • Receive Webhooks without needing an internet-facing Web server
  • Send Webhooks to a server that's behind a firewall or private subnet
  • Transforming Webhooks into other formats, and re-sending them to different systems
  • Connect different APIs that aren't compatible
  • Building contact forms that send emails
  • Instantly build APIs without needing infrastructure

Native integrations include:

  • Google Sheets
  • Dropbox
  • Discord
  • Slack
  • AWS S3 and CloudFront
  • SSH
  • FTP(S)

MockServer

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Webhook.site

$ Details
freemium $14.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform Python Windows Mac OSX Linux Command Line Interface
Release Date
2016 March

MockServer videos

No MockServer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Webhook.site videos

Webhook.site Custom Actions Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MockServer and Webhook.site)
API Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Developer Tools
36 36%
64% 64
APIs
39 39%
61% 61
Development
58 58%
42% 42

User comments

Share your experience with using MockServer and Webhook.site. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhook.site seems to be a lot more popular than MockServer. While we know about 68 links to Webhook.site, we've tracked only 3 mentions of MockServer. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MockServer mentions (3)

  • Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
    The open-source examples are mockoon, mock-server.com, etc. Source: 12 months ago
  • Testing with MockServer
    I've just found out MockServer and it looks awesome 🤩 so I wanted to check it out repeating the steps of my previous demo WireMock Testing which (as you can expect) uses WireMock, another fantastic tool to mock APIs. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • How to unit test successful Oauth requests of 3rd party API's?
    I tend to use MockServer. With MockServer you can define inputs, so you can say that the request should look like this with that URL, etc etc. That way you can verify that the request looks okay. Source: about 2 years ago

Webhook.site mentions (68)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Webhook.site - Verify webhooks, outbound HTTP requests, or emails with a custom URL. A temporary URL and email address are always free. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Spring Cloud Config, Spring Cloud Bus & Kafka | How to set up automatic updates of your configuration
    The automatic updates use webhooks from version control system platforms such as GitHub and GitLab. In this article, for correct working, the services should be deployed somewhere, like Cloud Platform Providers, but to keep things simple, we will do it on a local machine. You can create a webhook inside the repository’s settings section and get an idea of what information can be obtained from the webhook... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Developer’s Guide: working with webhooks on your localhost
    While inspecting the content of a webhook payload can be useful (for example by forwarding the webhook to tools like webhook.site), developers also require the capability to receive incoming webhooks directly in the application running on their laptop. It is a matter of more effective testing that verifies the correct processing on the incoming events and the associated workflow that follows. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Best way to handle webhooks from Woo-Advanced
    The webhook fires natively from inside the site, it's Yith Subscription plugin. I can get the webhook out and see the information if I test on a place like webhook.site. Everything works fine there. Source: 5 months ago
  • Building a Robust Webhook Service with Golang: A Comprehensive Guide
    With the Dockerfile written we can now start the docker containers, but first, you need to have a webhook URL to try this project. You can easily get a free one at https://webhook.site. Once it is done, create a file called .env at the root of the project, where the docker-compose.yaml file is present. Then, make sure to have similar content. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MockServer and Webhook.site, you can also consider the following products

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

RequestWatch - Inspect and debug HTTP requests

WireMock - WireMock - a web service test double for all occasions.

HttpMaster - HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.