Mockito VS Capybara

I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: 11 months ago

Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 1 year ago

You could use mocks, but you'd basically be implementing JSch. I'm not mocking a framework, and recently learned my misgivings have a name: the soviet police station anti-pattern. Source: over 1 year ago

In Mockito it exists the possibilty to use ArgumentCaptor to allow developers to verify the arguments used during the call of mocked method, but not the result itself. Indeed, in the current release of Mockito it's not possible to capture it and my solution to do that is to build a ResultCaptor class which implements the Answer interface and generify it for more conveniance. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

So I am building my own little project, which you can read about HERE and I have made the decision to use as few libraries as possible. Now that I am doing some testing I need some mock objects, which means I have to try to recreate Mockito. So this series will be me recreating Mockito the best I can. This post will be about creating a simple single use case implementation that gets our annotation working. It... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago