Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Kitematic VS Portworx

Compare Kitematic VS Portworx and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Kitematic logo Kitematic

The easiest way to start using Docker on your Mac

Portworx logo Portworx

Portworx provides enterprise-class data services, purpose-built for containers.
  • Kitematic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • Portworx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Kitematic

Categories
  • DevOps Tools
  • Developer Tools
  • Containers As A Service
  • Kubernetes
Website kitematic.com
Pricing URL-
Edit details

Portworx

Categories
  • Cloud Hosting
  • Developer Tools
  • Containers As A Service
  • Cloud Computing
Website portworx.com
Pricing URL Official Portworx Pricing
Edit details

Kitematic videos

+ Add

Get Started With Docker Quickly, using Kitematic

More videos:

  • Review - Jenkins on Docker using Kitematic on a Mac!
  • Tutorial - Hadoop tutorial - How to run Hue in no time with Docker and Kitematic

Portworx videos

+ Add

Portworx Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Persistent Storage with Portworx on Kubernetes
  • Review - Building Cloud Native Infrastructure with Portworx with Goutham Rao

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kitematic and Portworx)

Kitematic

Portworx

Developer Tools
78 78%
Developer Tools
22% 22
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100
Containers As A Service
81 81%
Containers As A Service
19% 19

User comments

Share your experience with using Kitematic and Portworx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Portworx might be a bit more popular than Kitematic. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Kitematic. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kitematic mentions (1)

  • Is there a way to insert a environmental variable without running the container in a git termal?
    Otherwise, you might want to see if Kitematic works for you - it's old and deprecated but might still function well enough for your uses. I have never used it myself, it's just a suggestion based on the GitHub issue. Source: over 2 years ago

Portworx mentions (1)

  • Network Storage on On-Prem Barebones Machine
    I would investigate https://openebs.io/ https://portworx.com/ https://longhorn.io/ if you are forced to you can mount ISCSI on the kublet and feed it to one of those solutions. Keep in mind most of the big guys buy some sort of managed solution that you can point a CSI like trident https://netapp-trident.readthedocs.io. Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kitematic and Portworx, you can also consider the following products

Portainer - Simple management UI for Docker

Tutum - Run, monitor, and scale Docker containers. Simply.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Loading...