Software Alternatives & Reviews

KeyBox VS Puma

Compare KeyBox VS Puma and see what are their differences

KeyBox logo KeyBox

A web-based SSH console that executes commands on multiple shells.

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.
  • KeyBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

KeyBox videos

Igloohome Smart Keybox 3 Lockbox REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Igloohome Keybox honest review

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to KeyBox and Puma)
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using KeyBox and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare KeyBox and Puma

KeyBox Reviews

We have no reviews of KeyBox yet.
Be the first one to post

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

KeyBox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of KeyBox yet. Tracking of KeyBox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing KeyBox and Puma, you can also consider the following products

Shell In A Box - Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Wetty - Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.