Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

JetBrains TeamCity VS Laminar

Compare JetBrains TeamCity VS Laminar and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JetBrains TeamCity logo JetBrains TeamCity

TeamCity is a continuous integration and build management system.

Laminar logo Laminar

Laminar is a lightweight, open-source, self-hosted Continuous Integration service for Linux
  • JetBrains TeamCity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • Laminar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-01

JetBrains TeamCity videos

No JetBrains TeamCity videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Laminar videos

+ Add

Laminar Flow Systems Stall and Roll Testing

More videos:

  • Review - Laminar Lip Screen add on/flip up review.
  • Review - Science Shorts: Laminar & Turbulent Flow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JetBrains TeamCity and Laminar)

JetBrains TeamCity

Laminar

DevOps Tools
66 66%
DevOps Tools
34% 34
Continuous Deployment
66 66%
Continuous Deployment
34% 34
Continuous Integration
66 66%
Continuous Integration
34% 34
CI
100 100%
CI
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JetBrains TeamCity and Laminar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Laminar seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JetBrains TeamCity mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JetBrains TeamCity yet. Tracking of JetBrains TeamCity recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Laminar mentions (7)

  • Log4j2 nightmares for self hosters?
    Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Self-hosted CI/CD options?
    I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What CI tool should I go with?
    For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Gitlab CI server alternative that is more FOSS
    Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Looking for a classical non-hosted CI platform that works and is not Jenkins
    I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JetBrains TeamCity and Laminar, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Buildbot - Python-based continuous integration testing framework

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs

Buildkite - Buildkite is a platform for running fast, secure, and scalable continuous integration pipelines on your own infrastructure.

Loading...