Based on our record, Fossil should be more popular than Jenkins. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
CloudBees Jenkins Platform is a commercial offering from CloudBees, it is not the Jenkins project itself (which is open source). Jenkins is alive and well. See https://jenkins.io. Source: 11 months ago
Ok. I'm talking about this: https://jenkins.io/. Source: over 1 year ago
Currently supported : Datadog, Jenkins, DNS, HTTP. Source: over 1 year ago
Saw this new blog post on jenkins.io which is really cool. Basically it is a free tool that you can use to help make sure your Jenkins system is managed well. Source: over 2 years ago
TL;DR: Your continuous integration platform (CICD) will host all the quality tools (e.g. test, lint) so it should come with a vibrant ecosystem of plugins. Jenkins used to be the default for many projects as it has the biggest community along with a very powerful platform at the price of a complex setup that demands a steep learning curve. Nowadays, it has become much easier to set up a CI solution using SaaS... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I don't think git should be the infrastructure of collaboration. It's good for long-lived artifacts, but isn't good for discussion, for rights management, ... Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) is of course better, but if git must remain, I believe the base infrastructure should be the mailing list. Patches, branches and releases can live inside a mailing list, it is naturally built for... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Have you spent much time using Fossil? https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
> To make things more complicated, they also use their a relatively niche version management system instead of git. Which would complicate making contributions (if they accepted them). The Fossil VCS actually has a page explaining why it was created, instead of just using Git: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html Honestly, a lot of those points make sense, especially how Git is perhaps a little bit more complex and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.