JavaScript Obfuscator VS Parcel

JavaScript Obfuscator Reviews

Parcel Reviews

JavaScript Obfuscator mentions (26)

• Need ideas with modding TCOAAL

  I don't need/use IDA, Nemlei just used https://obfuscator.io/, which just obfuscates the crap out of the code using various known methods (which I won't go into detail, it's public knowledge) and an un-obfuscation was cooked up by others. The one fucked-up thing the website does is randomizing function names, it just changes every variable/function name. We can't "un-obfuscate" those, so it's up to our brains to... Source: 5 months ago

• How do human read code like this

  It's to purposefully makes your code harder to read so it prevents people from stealing your work. Here's a tool that does it: https://obfuscator.io/. Source: about 1 year ago

• TIL you can de-obfuscate code with ChatGPT

  I just tested it on a little snippet of my code obfuscated with https://obfuscator.io/ and it worked seemingly perfectly. My original code:

    function resizeImage(img) {.

  - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Reverse Engineering TikTok's VM Obfuscation (Part 2)

  Https://obfuscator.io/ produces a similar result, perhaps that's all they used. Source: over 1 year ago

• Reverse Engineering Tiktok's VM Obfuscation (Part 1)

  The obfuscation looks very similar to what you might get from https://obfuscator.io/. Source: over 1 year ago

Parcel mentions (100)

• React Server Components Example with Next.js

  In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

• Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask

  Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Building Node.js applications without dependencies

  I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• 11 Ways to Optimize Your Website

  Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know

  In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago