Software Alternatives & Reviews

JAMS Scheduler VS Control-M

Compare JAMS Scheduler VS Control-M and see what are their differences

JAMS Scheduler logo JAMS Scheduler

Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • JAMS Scheduler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-23
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

JAMS Scheduler videos

Job Creation In Jams

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JAMS Scheduler and Control-M)
Workflow Automation
38 38%
62% 62
IT Automation
32 32%
68% 68
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Product Deployment
44 44%
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using JAMS Scheduler and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JAMS Scheduler and Control-M

JAMS Scheduler Reviews

9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
JAMS offers reliable enterprise support to host your Workflow. JAMS supports workflow activities, which allows you to integrate JAMS into your workflow business processes.

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JAMS Scheduler and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

IBM Workload Automation - IBM Workload Automation helps increase productivity and governance of enterprise business workloads with hybrid automation and applied analytics.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions