Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

IronMQ VS NSQ

Compare IronMQ VS NSQ and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

IronMQ logo IronMQ

IronMQ is the distributed systems together by providing a reliable way to communicate between services and components.

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.
  • IronMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-03
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07

IronMQ

Categories
  • Data Integration
  • Web Service Automation
  • Stream Processing
  • Integrations Platform As A Service
Website iron.io
Details $-
Edit details

NSQ

Categories
  • Data Integration
  • Stream Processing
  • Web Service Automation
  • ETL
Website nsq.io
Details $
Edit details

IronMQ videos

+ Add

IronMQ, the fastest industrial strength MQ available. Deploy anywhere, including fully On premise.

More videos:

  • Review - IronMQ as a Celery Transport
  • Review - IronWorker and IronMQ: Cron jobs and messaging in the cloud

NSQ videos

+ Add

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IronMQ and NSQ)

IronMQ

NSQ

Data Integration
35 35%
Data Integration
65% 65
Stream Processing
32 32%
Stream Processing
68% 68
Web Service Automation
34 34%
Web Service Automation
66% 66
Integrations Platform As A Service
100 100%
Integrations Platform As A Service
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using IronMQ and NSQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare IronMQ and NSQ

IronMQ Reviews

Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
Iron.io's IronMQ provides a compelling alternative to open-source messaging queues. It is a highly available message queue service built primarily for the cloud. IronMQ can run on any public or private cloud, or on-premise, and offers robust functionality and strong performance. It addresses many of the challenges open-source tools present, offering robust support,...
Source: blog.iron.io

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NSQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IronMQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IronMQ yet. Tracking of IronMQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IronMQ and NSQ, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Azure Logic Apps - Discover the leading Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) that enables key enterprise scenarios for developers to build powerful integration solutions quickly.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - Anypoint Platform is a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

Loading...