ImageKit.io VS Optimage

Having the server decide the image format based on the accept header is simpler. Services like https://imagekit.io/ (no affiliation) can do that for you. - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago

Hosting wise, I would reccomend pythonanywhere.com, combined with either https://imagekit.io or https://cloudinary.com. Source: 12 months ago

Use any third-party service to store images like Cloudinary , imagekit etc... And store image URLs in your database. If you have fewer images you keep image URLs directly in your APIs. Source: over 1 year ago

Imagekit.io – Image CDN with automatic optimization, real-time transformation, and storage that you can integrate with existing setup in minutes. Free plan includes up to 20GB bandwidth per month. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

We'll be using Multer to handle file uploads on our server and imagekit will do all our media heavy lifting. I chose these tools because I just found them easier to use and the latter has a very elaborate documentation (and a free tier too 😋). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I use the one https://optimage.app/. Source: 10 months ago

Optimage is a batch image compression/resize app that I use to standardise images sent to me by clients for their website. Source: over 1 year ago

I’ve found Optimage to work better, at least for me. Source: over 1 year ago

I have something like this myself setup to automatically optimize new screenshots using Optimage ($15), but I should be able to walk you through the steps, as everything you need is built into Mac. Source: almost 2 years ago

I personally swear by Optimage. Although its primary function is images, it also does video. It is fast and it has a very generous free offering (24 files per day). It doesn't have many options, but to me, that's a feature, not a bug. Source: over 2 years ago