Software Alternatives & Reviews

Hudson VS CircleCI

Compare Hudson VS CircleCI and see what are their differences

Hudson logo Hudson

Hudson is an extensible Continuous Integration Server

CircleCI logo CircleCI

CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
  • Hudson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • CircleCI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Hudson videos

Hudson H9 Review: Meme or Magical?

More videos:

  • Review - Could The Hudson H9 Be A Collectors Item? 🤔
  • Review - Hudson Whisky Single Malt Review

CircleCI videos

CircleCI Part 1: Introduction to Unit Testing and Continuous Integration

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Setup CircleCI On Your Next Project (Vue, React, or Angular)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hudson and CircleCI)
Continuous Integration
DevOps Tools
7 7%
93% 93
Continuous Deployment
8 8%
92% 92
Dev Ops
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Hudson and CircleCI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hudson and CircleCI

Hudson Reviews

We have no reviews of Hudson yet.
Be the first one to post

CircleCI Reviews

35+ Of The Best CI/CD Tools: Organized By Category
CircleCI is a complete CI/CD pipeline tool. You can monitor the statuses of your various pipelines from your dashboard. Additionally, CircleCI helps you manage your build logs, access controls, and testing. It’s one of the most popular DevOps and CI/CD platforms in the world.
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
CircleCI is generally recognized for its flexibility and compatibility. Customization is obviously an important factor when making the switch from Jenkins and CircleCI certainly takes an impressive swing at providing users with a solid collection of features.
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CircleCI is a flexible tool with easy maintenance and can run in almost any environment. Every commit leads to automatic build execution. To add to it, if any new build is triggered, any queued or running build is automatically canceled.
Continuous Integration. CircleCI vs Travis CI vs Jenkins
Now, when the process of continuous integration is clear (I hope so) we can move to the comparison of some of the most popular CI platforms nowadays. Each of those has its pros and cons. Let’s start with CircleCI.
Source: djangostars.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CircleCI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hudson mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hudson yet. Tracking of Hudson recommendations started around Mar 2021.

CircleCI mentions (61)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hudson and CircleCI, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed

Chef - Automation for all of your technology. Overcome the complexity and rapidly ship your infrastructure and apps anywhere with automation.