Software Alternatives & Reviews

HTTP VS micro_httpd

Compare HTTP VS micro_httpd and see what are their differences


is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.
HTTP Landing Page
HTTP Landing Page
micro_httpd Landing Page
micro_httpd Landing Page

HTTP details

Categories
Web Browser Cloud Storage P2P
Website datatracker.ietf.org  

micro_httpd details

Categories
Web And Application Servers Web Servers HTTP/2 Web Server
Website acme.com  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP and micro_httpd)
31
31%
69%
69
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP mentions (4)

  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Let's Stop Building APIs Around a Network Hack
    This is wrong. HTTP/1.0 had a keep-alive header field as mentioned in the HTTP/1.1 RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#appendix-A.1.2 But in HTTP/1.1 that's the default: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-6.3
       o  If the received protocol is HTTP/1.1 (or later), the connection will persist after the current response; else,.
    - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • An HTTP server in a single .c file
    Context: RFC 2616 and RFC 7230 require CRLF line endings instead of just LF. 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP and micro_httpd, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

ZeroNet - ZeroNet. Open, free and uncensorable websites, using Bitcoin cryptography and BitTorrent network. Download for Windows 9. 6MB · Unpack · Run ZeroNet. exe.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

User reviews

Share your experience with using HTTP and micro_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review