Software Alternatives & Reviews

Happstack Lite VS Scotty

Compare Happstack Lite VS Scotty and see what are their differences

Happstack Lite logo Happstack Lite

Happstack itself is a web framework created in Haskell. Happstack Lite is an easier version to use that can import features from the heftier version if need be.

Scotty logo Scotty

Scotty is a Haskell framework inspired by Ruby's Sinatra.
  • Happstack Lite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-27
  • Scotty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Happstack Lite and Scotty)
Web Frameworks
43 43%
57% 57
API Tools
42 42%
58% 58
Developer Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Online Education
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Happstack Lite and Scotty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Scotty seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Happstack Lite mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Happstack Lite yet. Tracking of Happstack Lite recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Scotty mentions (13)

  • haskell todo list app (beginner)
    I would suggest checking out scotty for the http server - it uses warp by default, and is very beginner-friendly. Source: 11 months ago
  • School of Haskell: Basics
    If you're not a fan of the ruby-on-rails / swiss army knife approach that IHP takes, check out Scotty. Add Lucid for Html rendering, and Selda for Postgres. (There are other options for any of these tools if you prefer) - Scotty (simple web routing) https://hackage.haskell.org/package/scotty. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Use Haskell from Nodejs
    Writing a Haskell webserver (maybe using scotty) and call it from node. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Programming language comparison by reimplementing the same transit data app
    I think ‘worst’ is very subjective here. It certainly does aim to be an all-encompassing ‘framework’ — but this is hardly unusual amongst web libraries (not just for Haskell!), and I feel Yesod gets the job done pretty well. Of course, Haskell has many alternatives if you don’t like Yesod: amongst other libraries, there’s Servant [0], snap [1], scotty [2], and the lower-level wai [3] and warp [4] if you feel the... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Suggestions for "dashboard" graphics libraries?
    I've found htmx and hyperscript talking to scotty to be an easy way to get something like this going while retaining the joys of Haskell on the backend and avoiding the pains of Haskell on the frontend. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Happstack Lite and Scotty, you can also consider the following products

IHP - The fastest way to buildtype safe web apps 🔥

Yesod - Yesod is a development tool used to create highly efficient websites and web applications from the ground up. Yesod includes almost everything you need to build a website, from templates to routing and execution. Read more about Yesod.

wai-routes - Type safe routing framework for wai

Servant - servant is a set of libraries that makes building Haskell webservices a breeze.

Nested-Routes - Very similar to Scotty, except with the ability to nest handlers and embed parsers as a location to handle.

Apiary - Collaborative design, instant API mock, generated documentation, integrated code samples, debugging and automated testing