Semantic UI might be a bit more popular than Haml. We know about 17 links to it since March 2021 and only 17 links to Haml. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
First of all, I like Slim. I like the beauty and cleanness of Slim templates, to me they are way more readable than regular ERB templates and I think they fit in the ruby/Rails ecosystem very well. Slim is a close cousin to Haml, without the ugly percent characters, haha. I've used Slim exclusively in my projects since about 2016. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
> I can't say what problem it is supposed to solve "Haml accelerates and simplifies template creation" https://haml.info/ If you'd rather write raw HTML, keeping track of closing tags etc, then don't use HAML. No need to bash it because you personally feel it is ugly or unnecessary. FWIW I personally feel the exact opposite. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
There is a better side by side of the syntax here https://haml.info (i've been using haml for 17 years lol, I find it more enjoyable to read and write). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Personally, I'd recommend Maud if you don't need something with runtime reloading. Not only is it much faster, it implements a template language that is effectively the Rust-syntax equivalent to Slim or Haml using a procedural macro, so you get compile-time verification that your HTML output is well-formed. Source: about 1 year ago
Does this support HAML-style syntax? We're 100% HAML-only for templating, whether normal Rails views or ViewComponent... https://github.com/haml/haml so going back to writing HTML or ERB feels like a huge downgrade. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
What stack are you using? I personally recommend utilizing readily available components: https://ui.shadcn.com/ https://mui.com/ https://semantic-ui.com/ etc.. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Are you cool with JS frameworks? If so, you can use a higher level of abstraction that takes care of the CSS for you. If you just want to mock something up, you can use a pre-built UI system / component framework and just put together UIs declaratively, without having to worry about the underlying CSS or HTML at all. Examples include https://mui.com/ and https://chakra-ui.com/ and https://ant.design/ Really easy... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Honestly you should build a webpage and use a UI library if you want markdown with some extra pop. Check out semantic ui. Source: over 1 year ago
A lot of proof-of-concept and MVP projects start out with a number of libraries meant to be temporary. Maybe the app was using Chakra UI for its modal and custom buttons, while the rest of the imported library is just dead weight. Perhaps developers have been spending more time adjusting Semantic UI’s styling to match the designs than it’s worth. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Semantic UI Semantic is a development framework that helps create beautiful, responsive layouts using human-friendly HTML. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...
Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.
UIKit - A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces
Pug - Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js
Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design