Software Alternatives & Reviews

Hakyll VS Pelican

Compare Hakyll VS Pelican and see what are their differences

Hakyll logo Hakyll

Hakyll - A Static Site Generator in Haskell.

Pelican logo Pelican

A static site generator, written in Python, that requires no database or server-side logic
  • Hakyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • Pelican Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-16

Hakyll videos

No Hakyll videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Pelican videos

Halo Infinite Mega Construx Pelican Inbound Review - Set GNB28

More videos:

  • Review - Pelican vs YETI Review | Roadie & Elite Portable Coolers (NEW!)
  • Review - Pelican vs YETI Coolers Review | Insulated Soft Sided Bags (NEW)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hakyll and Pelican)
CMS
22 22%
78% 78
Blogging
20 20%
80% 80
Blogging Platform
19 19%
81% 81
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Hakyll and Pelican. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pelican should be more popular than Hakyll. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hakyll mentions (6)

  • Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform
    Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • I want to make a website for myself
    Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • State of the Web: Static Site Generators
    Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I did a thing : Hakyll with Internationalization;
    Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, ‏‏‎ please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
  • About GitLab and Pages by Safely Dysfunctional
    This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

Pelican mentions (24)

  • Patterns for Personal Web Sites
    In my experience, [Pelican](https://getpelican.com/) does a good job of allowing you to edit themes on all pages at once with its static page generator. There are a lot of built in features designed more for blog-like websites, but I’ve found it pretty easy to make my personal website with it. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • How to host final project (flask web application) on permanent server?
    There's also Pelican but I haven't used it and seeing as Github serves static pages I'd imagine it builds and deploys your page and is done with it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Which Python or Rust-based static site generators to use as of 2023?
    I use Pelican (https://getpelican.com/) for my blog, which works decently for me. It is a static site generator written in Python. But you probably won't learn much Python by using it (or Rust when using a generator written in it) since you probably won't need to change anything in it. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Creating a Python Wiki application
    Surely a "local private wiki ... Not web based ... On a desktop application" is not really a "wiki" at all, but rather a "static site generator" with a built-in "search". If that's what you want, there's a Python app called Pelican. Writing such an app from scratch isn't really a beginners project. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Top ten popular static site generators (SSG) in 2023
    Pelican — best for Python developers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hakyll and Pelican, you can also consider the following products

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Hexo - A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js