grsecurity VS SELinux

grsecurity mentions (4)

• Linux security mitigation broken for a year without anyone noticing

  Yes, https://grsecurity.net/ Why did you use archive.org to get to wikipedia?? - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Desktop User: Should I use a "hardened" kernel?

  There's https://grsecurity.net/, which has an additional patchset, but many argue (and I agree, that it violates the GPL). Source: about 1 year ago

• I’m aware that the template is kinda bad

  1.https://www.privacyguides.org/basics/threat-modeling/ 2. https://www.privacyguides.org/linux-desktop/overview/ 3. https://www.privacyguides.org/basics/common-threats/#common-misconceptions 4. https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux.html 5. Founder of Qubes 6. https://twitter.com/justinschuh/status/1190347400885329920 7.... Source: over 1 year ago

• Opinion: The idea that software should be eternally updated in order to ensure security should be highly discouraged

  At the much more sophisticated end of the spectrum is the fundamental premise behind (grsecurity)[https://grsecurity.net/], who imo have been miles ahead of the game for over a decade. They had features like ASLR and RAP for YEARS before even being thought about in various mainstream OS builds. It is really sad that corporate greed and theft by some larger players forced the grsecurity team to move away from a... Source: over 2 years ago

SELinux mentions (0)