Software Alternatives & Reviews

GNU nano VS JOE

Compare GNU nano VS JOE and see what are their differences

GNU nano logo GNU nano

GNU nano is a small and friendly text editor.

JOE logo JOE

JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed under the GNU General...
  • GNU nano Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-20
  • JOE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-01

GNU nano videos

No GNU nano videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

JOE videos

Joe - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Joe Movie Review (Schmoes Know)
  • Review - Barstool Pizza Review - Joe & Pat's Pizzeria

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU nano and JOE)
Text Editors
70 70%
30% 30
Software Development
70 70%
30% 30
IDE
70 70%
30% 30
IDEs And Text Editors
67 67%
33% 33

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU nano and JOE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JOE seems to be a lot more popular than GNU nano. While we know about 14 links to JOE, we've tracked only 1 mention of GNU nano. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU nano mentions (1)

  • Inspired by a meme made by u/Craz_64
    GNU nano is a text editor for Unix-like computing systems or operating environments using a command line interface. It emulates the Pico text editor, part of the Pine email client, and also provides additional functionality. Unlike Pico, nano is licensed under the GNU General Public License. Source: almost 3 years ago

JOE mentions (14)

  • WordStar: Arrogant, Difficult, Powerful (2022)
    I actually have a bound set for WordStar 4. If you want to use something similar on modern systems, try "Joe's Own Editor." https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Micro – A Modern Alternative to Nano
    JOE is pretty nice https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ — a hybrid of WordStar and Emacs, and if you run it with `jstar` you get a pretty authentic WordStar experience which also reminds of the earliest Borland Turbo IDEs. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • RAM requirement for a cyberdeck for writing
    If you want to change your workflow, you might consider using a terminal based text editor though. There are many out there, the most famous being vi or emacs (though both a bit hard to use) and packages specifically for word processing exist as well (for example https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/). It will need more getting used to, but this will pretty much run on a potato and you could use a pi zero or any... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Resolving the Great Undo-Redo Quandary
    JOE [1] has worked this way as long as I remember (which is close to 20 years). [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How do you uninstall compiled and installed things?
    I installed joe's own ediot https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ by compiling it and using install script. I used it few times before going back to vim. Now I wanna uninstall it. Is there any 'automatic' way of uninstalling it? Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU nano and JOE, you can also consider the following products

Notepad++ - A free source code editor which supports several programming languages running under the MS Windows environment.

Micro - Modern terminal-based text editor

Visual Studio Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

WordGrinder - WordGrinder is a word processor for processing words. It is not WYSIWYG. It is not point and click.