Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GNU Make VS Visual Build

Compare GNU Make VS Visual Build and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Visual Build logo Visual Build

Visual Build enables developers and build masters to create an automated, repeatable build process.
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Visual Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

Visual Build features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and Visual Build)

GNU Make

Visual Build

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and Visual Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and Visual Build, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

FinalBuilder - FinalBuilder is a build automation tool.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Capistrano - A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

Loading...