Software Alternatives & Reviews

GNU Common Lisp VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare GNU Common Lisp VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

GNU Common Lisp logo GNU Common Lisp

GCL is the official Common Lisp for the GNU project.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • GNU Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-22
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

GNU Common Lisp

Categories
  • Programming Language
  • IDE
  • OOP
  • Text Editors
Website gnu.org
Details $-

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Categories
  • Programming Language
  • OOP
  • IDE
  • Text Editors
Website sbcl.org
Details $

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
22 22%
78% 78
IDE
23 23%
77% 77
OOP
26 26%
74% 74
Text Editors
27 27%
73% 73

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Common Lisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Common Lisp yet. Tracking of GNU Common Lisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 11 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

ManKai Common Lisp - ManKai Common Lisp (MKCL) aims to be a full implementation of the Common Lisp language in...

Clozure Common Lisp - Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Armed Bear Common Lisp - Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL) is a full implementation of the Common Lisp language featuring both...