Software Alternatives & Reviews

GlusterFS VS MooseFS

Compare GlusterFS VS MooseFS and see what are their differences

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

MooseFS logo MooseFS

MooseFS is a fault tolerant, network distributed file system.
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10
  • MooseFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

GlusterFS

Categories
  • Cloud Storage
  • Storage
  • Cloud Computing
  • Object Storage
Website gluster.org
Details $

MooseFS

Categories
  • Cloud Storage
  • Storage
  • Cloud Computing
  • File Sharing
Website moosefs.com
Details $

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

MooseFS videos

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - MooseFS – Distributed File System – Overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GlusterFS and MooseFS)
Cloud Storage
78 78%
22% 22
Cloud Computing
82 82%
18% 18
Storage
76 76%
24% 24
Object Storage
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GlusterFS and MooseFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

MooseFS might be a bit more popular than GlusterFS. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to GlusterFS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: 12 months ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 3 years ago

MooseFS mentions (2)

  • Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
    MooseFS is designed for large files and can have a global goal of 1 copy (no replication) https://moosefs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Can someone tell me if this is possible or even a good idea?
    My friends and I all use Linux and often use each others laptops or desktops when we forget ours. Then I had the idea to install Linux on a USB so I could have all my stuff and use my system on any system. Which was cool but then I ran into the same problem of forgetting it sometimes. So my new idea (which I have no idea how I'd achieve) is to use something like MooseFS or ceph or some distributed filesystem for... Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GlusterFS and MooseFS, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

rkt - App Container runtime

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…