Software Alternatives & Reviews

Garden (Clojure) VS Rework

Compare Garden (Clojure) VS Rework and see what are their differences

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.

Rework logo Rework

Let's Make Work Better. Research, ideas, and practices from Google and others, to put people first.
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Rework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

Garden (Clojure)

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Design Tools
  • Development Tools
Website github.com

Rework

Categories
  • Developer Tools
  • CSS Framework
  • Development Tools
  • Design Tools
Website amzn.to

Garden (Clojure) videos

No Garden (Clojure) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Rework videos

REWORK by Jason Fried | Animated Core Message

More videos:

  • Review - I read a book recommended by @Ankur Warikoo- REWORK review [Wisewithgrace]
  • Review - Top 5 learnings from Rework by Jason Fried | Rework Summary in Hindi | Ankur Warikoo Books

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Garden (Clojure) and Rework)
CSS Framework
70 70%
30% 30
Developer Tools
68 68%
32% 32
Design Tools
66 66%
34% 34
Development Tools
63 63%
37% 37

User comments

Share your experience with using Garden (Clojure) and Rework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 1 year ago

Rework mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Rework yet. Tracking of Rework recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Garden (Clojure) and Rework, you can also consider the following products

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).