Fox toolkit VS Uno Platform

The Fox Toolkit [0] always looks like Windows 95, and is still getting updates. Its lack of themeability is presumably one of the reasons it's so fast and lightweight. [0] http://fox-toolkit.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

And Uno Platform (https://platform.uno/) is akin to React Native in terms of native controls usage. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Also UNO Platform (C#) which is suitable for simple or complex cross platform business applications : https://platform.uno/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Why is this a problem? At face value, it isn't a problem. Taking a step back at a more global level, what does "uComponents" mean to the rest of the world? Many of the .NET developers who heavily use NuGet may have not even heard of Umbraco CMS, let alone a 3rd party plugin for it. What if people from the Uno Platform community are browsing NuGet for some kind of components extension library? You can see, this... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Not a fan of XAML after trying to get into it, but there is Uno Platform. It wraps native widgets on mobile, just like React Native (which is good for accessibility), and uses C#. https://platform.uno/ My guess is that it's mainly focused on mobile. On Windows, it has no overhead (behaving like a normal WinUI 3 app), on macOS I think it uses Catalyst by default (which was developed by Apple to make more iOS apps... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

> ...building UIs with the document/element api When the whole premise is flawed, JSX or not, does it really matter if there is a better or worse way of misusing a technology not meant for UIs? Leave HTML and JavaScript to Wikipedia and other hypertext document libraries. Unfortunately, WASM is not there yet, but people are trying: https://platform.uno. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago