Software Alternatives & Reviews

FitNesse VS PractiTest

Compare FitNesse VS PractiTest and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

PractiTest logo PractiTest

PractiTest is a cloud based Innovative test management tool.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • PractiTest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

PractiTest videos

PractiTest Webinar Series: Unconventional Ideas for Revolutionary Testing Teams

More videos:

  • Review - Your Testing Project Preparation Checklist - PractiTest Webinar
  • Review - TestCraft & PractiTest Integration

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and PractiTest)
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Software Testing
4 4%
96% 96

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and PractiTest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

PractiTest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PractiTest yet. Tracking of PractiTest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and PractiTest, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Micro Focus ALM - Learn how Micro Focus’ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) software tools provide the agility, visibility, and collaboration solutions you need to optimize app development and testing, foster innovation, and improve the user experience.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Visual Studio Team Services - Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) provides unlimited Git hosting, cloud build for CI, agile planning and continuous delivery.