Fink VS NixOS
Compare Fink VS NixOS and see what are their differences
SmartWindows.app
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
SmartWindows.app
Fink
Homebrew
Homebrew Cask
Rudix
MacPorts
pkgsrc
Conda
Nix
NixOS
GNU Guix
Homebrew
Chocolatey
asdf-vm
Flatpak
npm
Synaptic
Fink| Categories |
|
|---|---|
| Website | finkproject.org |
| Details $ | - |
Based on our record, NixOS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 245 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Nix is a cross-platform package manager. It uses the nix programming language. Nix and NixOs are often used in the same context, but while the first is a package manager, the latter is a linux distribution based on nix. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
Today I want to talk to you about Nixos. What is it? Nixos is a declarative and reproducible OS, partly taking the words used on their own page. What does that mean? - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
Software developers often want to customize: 1. Their home environments: for packages (some reach for brew on MacOS) and configurations (dotfiles, and some reach for stow). 2. Their development shells: for build dependencies (compilers, SDKs, libraries), tools (LSP, linters, formatters, debuggers), and services (runtime, database). Some reach for devcontainers here. 3. Or even their operating systems: for... - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
Hopping from one distro to another with a different package manager might require some time to adapt. Using a package manager that can be installed on most distro is one way to help you get to work faster. Flatpak is one of them; other alternative are Snap, Nix or Homebrew. Flatpak is a good starter, and if you have a bunch of free time, I suggest trying Nix. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
- it reduces bloat, because you can generate an environment or OS image with only the software needed to run a specific program or service My guess is that a big efficiency gain would come from the second point, because you don't waste CPU on code that you don't use. Does this make sense? Has anyone explored this? [0]: https://nixos.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
GNU Guix - Like Nix but GNU.
Homebrew Cask - Install with ease. Your software is just one command away from being ready and raring to go. Forget all about babysitting the install process step by step, from website to cleanup. ls /usr/local/Caskroom google-chrome .
Rudix - Rudix is a package-based, user-friendly way to extend the Unix portion of Mac OS X with additional...
Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.
MacPorts - The MacPorts Project is an open-source community initiative to design an easy-to-use system for compiling, installing, and upgrading either command-line, X11 or Aqua based open-source software on the Mac OS X operating system.