FactCheck
Snopes
Healthcare.gov
CostPlus Drugs
VeriFact
Health Sherpa
TruthOrFiction
Split Pic
Google Scholar
PubMed.gov
SCI-HUB
Forge
Leap Motion
360° media
CardBoard
OpenSpace3D
FactCheckNo FactCheck videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Google Scholar should be more popular than FactCheck. It has been mentiond 999 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Sute, it has all been 'debunked', presumably by your favourite website, factcheck.org, brought to you by the Annenberg Foundation. RWJF and Facebook. Source: 10 months ago
This is very very simple. The answer is yes. You're so naive you believe factcheck.org. Source: 11 months ago
I presented you the facts. He was listed as an owner and shareholder still as of time it was fact checked by factcheck.org in both the USA and China. Source: 11 months ago
Since you get your news from bombastic headlines, let's educate you with data from factcheck.org, again, not conservative leaning at all (it's run by RAND corp, and has a "Lean Left" rating from Allsides Media Bias Rating. Factcheck says, "There also was no part of the state’s lawsuit that dealt with allegations that the Trump Foundation “stole from a kids cancer charity,” as the posts claim. That detail appears... Source: 12 months ago
Factcheck.org is a 'leftist' source? What does that mean to you? What is leftist about the facts portrayed? Or is it that you can't comprehend the facts that makes it leftist? Source: 12 months ago
A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 5 months ago
Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 5 months ago
Snopes - The definitive Internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
Healthcare.gov - Since the healthcare law took full effect this year, HealthCare.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
CostPlus Drugs - Mark Cubans latest venture, Cost Plus, offers hundreds of common (and often life-saving) medications at the lowest possible prices by cutting out the pharmacy middlemen and passing all savings to you.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple
