Exiv2 VS Exif Purge

I prefer exiv2 to exiftool. Smaller download and installation. https://exiv2.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I'm sorry? So you're saying I should get the developer of the external source (output from exiv2 as it happens) to re-code so I get cleaner data? Really ... Source: over 1 year ago

There is a similar program called exiv2. Exiv2 is a C++ library, so it's more commonly used in other programs, while exiftool is written in Perl. Even the Windows "executable" is simply a minimal Perl interpreter and the code which is PAR packed. Source: over 1 year ago

I mentioned Exiv2 on a blog post from 2 years ago regarding Supporting ColdFusion with Command Line Programs. Someone in the Adobe ColdFusion Forum recently inquired how to "use ImageGetEXIFMetaData to try to get gps coordinates of an image". - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

The main problem with metadata is that it is often erased by broad editors, making it impossible to disclose information about a person. And the fact that almost everyone uses editors, that is why there is no chance to read them. In addition, EXIF ​​is very easy to erase or change on your own using exifpurge.com, so it is impossible to fully verify this search method. Source: about 2 years ago

For tools, on PC, the go-to tools has been EXIF Purge, and there are several tools on both App Store and Play Store (I use Imagepipe). Samsung (and Google Camera, apparently) allows disabling location tags in their camera app, though if you don't trust them and find its result to be OK, then you can use Open Camera instead. Source: over 2 years ago