Erlang VS Flow Type

I’m on MacOS and erlang.org, elixir-lang.org, and postgresql.org all suggest installation via Homebrew, which is a very popular package manager for MacOS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

However, as Elixir is inherently tied to the BEAM and Erlang/OTP, it means that it has features like immutable variables (though you can rebind them and have state via process loops, e.g. Agents or GenServers). This also means that OTP is the main "application framework" for Elixir/Erlang. In my opinion, OTP is a pretty good design philosophy for applications, but sometimes it's just kind of hard to set up or wrap... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

I love JS, but I want types. I don't want TypeScript though, but I'll do it if the job requires it. Has anyone tried building in flow for a large project? This was facebook's static type checking approach: https://flow.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

In my examples, I’ll use the Flow type system so that it’s easier to follow the idea. The code consists of two parts: a service API and a recommendation flow. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

You think we could try to make it such that people use JS + Flow the static type checker. Source: over 1 year ago

The two biggest contenders in adding static types to JavaScript are Flow (by Facebook) and TypeScript (by Microsoft). As of date, there is no clear winner in the battle. For now, we have made the choice of using Flow. We find that Flow has a lower learning curve as compared to TypeScript and it requires relatively less effort to migrate an existing code base to Flow. Being built by Facebook, Flow has better... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Just FYI, Facebook has a JS dialect called Flow. There was a point in time that Flow and TypeScript were duking it out, but clearly TS has won. I think Flow is still used inside Facebook, but I don't think it has really caught on in the larger developer ecosystem. Source: over 1 year ago