Editthis VS Citizendium

Compare Editthis VS Citizendium and see what are their differences

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Editthis

A free wikifarm project allowing to keep private wiki and build it up through MediaWiki syntax.

Citizendium

A wiki for providing free knowledge where authors use their real, verified names.

Landing page //
2022-09-19

Landing page //
2023-09-12

Categories	Content Collaboration Wikis And Discussion Spaces Note Taking WiKi
Website	editthis.info

Categories	Content Collaboration Note Taking Wikis And Discussion Spaces WiKi
Website	en.citizendium.org

Editthis videos

No Editthis videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Citizendium videos

+ Add

Citizendium

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editthis and Citizendium)

Citizendium

Content Collaboration

58 58%

Content Collaboration

42% 42

Wikis And Discussion Spaces

59 59%

Wikis And Discussion Spaces

41% 41

Education & Reference

72 72%

Education & Reference

28% 28

Note Taking

47 47%

Note Taking

53% 53

User comments

Share your experience with using Editthis and Citizendium. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Citizendium seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Editthis mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editthis yet. Tracking of Editthis recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Citizendium mentions (3)

Toxic comments are associated with reduced volunteer editors on Wikipedia
> the only conclusion is that the system is flawed. There's a need for a fundamental change in approach There are attempts of creating more "professional" electronic encyclopedia like Citizendium [1] and Scholarpedia [2] but it seems that such tasks are rather hard since Wikipedia solidified its position already, despite flaws [1] - https://en.citizendium.org/ [2] - http://www.scholarpedia.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Kristi Noem hired sculptors to create a Mount Rushmore 'mini-replica' — with Trump 'right next to Abraham Lincoln'
Larry Sanger was more or less evicted from Wikipedia because his viewpoints and personality conflicted with virtually everyone else, which was, as it still is, made of a broad group of people across the globe. He was with Wikipedia for a year and has criticized the project since he left after his salary was cut. His follow up project, Citizendium is dead. Source: over 2 years ago
What the hell happened to the wiki?
Sanger hasn't built anything that amounted to anything. He's been involved with a bunch of failed projects like Citizendium, most of which were based on the premise that Wikipedia is broken because 1) it allows anyone to contribute and 2) it's not conservative enough. History has proved him wrong. Source: over 2 years ago