Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

DocBook VS Text::Amuse

Compare DocBook VS Text::Amuse and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

DocBook logo DocBook

DocBook is a schema (available in several languages including RELAX NG, SGML and XML DTDs, and W3C...

Text::Amuse logo Text::Amuse

Markup language for AMuseWiki.
  • DocBook Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-20
  • Text::Amuse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-04-23

DocBook videos

+ Add

DocBook Editing Support in Oxygen XML Editor 18.1

More videos:

  • Review - DocBook Profiling in Oxygen XML Editor 12
  • Review - DocBook Documentation at SUSE Automatically Ensuring Quality of SUSE Documentation

Text::Amuse videos

No Text::Amuse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to DocBook and Text::Amuse)

DocBook

Text::Amuse

Documentation
65 65%
Documentation
35% 35
Documentation As A Service & Tools
64 64%
Documentation As A Service & Tools
36% 36
Project Management
54 54%
Project Management
46% 46
Document Automation
59 59%
Document Automation
41% 41

User comments

Share your experience with using DocBook and Text::Amuse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Text::Amuse might be a bit more popular than DocBook. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to DocBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

DocBook mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: LaTeX is great. Has anyone tried to build something better?
    The two that come to mind are ConTeXt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConTeXt (official: https://contextgarden.net) and DocBook https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook (official: https://docbook.org). There are others, but they're less-serious and often not general purpose. Then there's the entire class of Markdown-based solutions (I personally wouldn't attempt academic work with any of those). The other typesetting... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Text::Amuse mentions (1)

  • How to import books into The Anarchist Library?
    Amuse markup manual. You can talk to librarians via IRC, there's usually someone online. Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing DocBook and Text::Amuse, you can also consider the following products

Nots.io - Keep your documentation up-to-date | Nots.io

Groff - The groff (GNU troff) software is a typesetting package which reads plain text mixed with...

Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code

GitHub Flavored Markdown - GitHub uses "GitHub Flavored Markdown," or GFM, across the site--in issues, comments, and...

Confluence - Confluence is content collaboration software that changes how modern teams work

Asciidoctor - In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.

Loading...