Dependabot VS FOSSA

Dependabot Reviews

FOSSA Reviews

Dependabot mentions (13)

• Be Secure and Compliant with GitHub

  GitHub integrated security scanning for vulnerabilities in their repositories. When they find a vulnerability that is solved in a newer version, they file a Pull Request with the suggested fix. This is done by a tool called Dependabot. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• How to configure Dependabot with Gradle

  Dependabot provides a way to keep your dependencies up to date. Depending on the configuration, it checks your dependency files for outdated dependencies and opens PRs individually. Then based on requirement PRs can be reviewed and merged. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Yarn.lock: how it works and what you risk without maintaining yarn dependencies — deep dive

  The first approach we looked at was Dependabot - a well-known tool for bumping dependencies. It checks for possible updates, opens Pull Requests with them, and allow users to review and merge (if you're confident enough with your test suite you can even set auto-merge). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• 5 tools to automate your development

  Dependabot is dead simple and their punchline clearly states what it does. We started using it a couple of years back, a bit before Github acquired it. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

• Keeping dependencies up-to-date in Composer

  The most known tool for this is Dependabot. Dependabot integrates seemlessly into Github and is able to create pull requests for outdated dependencies. If you have set up automated tests on your codebase all you have to do is merge the pull request created by Dependabot. It does not get any easier. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

FOSSA mentions (7)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  FOSSA - Scalable, end-to-end management for third-party code, license compliance and vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• The Haskell job market has been growing steaily since 2008

  For us, there were a couple advantages. For context, I work at FOSSA (https://fossa.com/). Our core product solves software supply chain needs in enterprises (around licensing and security), and our core technology is around compiler, build, and source code analysis. Off the top of my head, 3 advantages stood out: 1. First, if you're not going that far off the beaten low-level path, Haskell has incredible... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• How to Automate the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)

  In this example, we'll explain how to create SBOM with FOSSA, an open-source dependency management tool ranked as the most significant SCA solution by the Forrester Wave. It helps you protect your software from open source risks such as supply chain threats and license violations. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• SBOM management

  I saw https://fossa.com/ and https://anchore.com/ which seem to solve what I have in mind but I wanted to know if there's maybe an open source way of getting a better overview besides running trivy sbom everytime I want to know something about a given sbom file. Source: over 1 year ago

• Keeping Up With Vulnerable Third-Party Libraries

  Our current project runs a Fossa scan as part of the automatic pipeline. Source: almost 2 years ago