Software Alternatives & Reviews

CSS Next VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare CSS Next VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

CSS Next logo CSS Next

Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • CSS Next Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-22
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Next and Garden (Clojure))
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
CSS Framework
53 53%
47% 47
Design Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Development Tools
53 53%
47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Next and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Garden (Clojure) might be a bit more popular than CSS Next. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to CSS Next. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Next mentions (2)

  • PostCSS - my initial experience
    The author of the most popular PostCSS plugin himself recommended the postcss-preset-env over his own creation which is cssnex, and. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Vanilla+PostCSS as an Alternative to SCSS
    Switching from a ready-made tool like Sass or a recommendation package like cssnext (deprecated since 2019) or PostCSS Preset Env (archived in 2022), to the modular PostCSS Preset Env plugin set we can choose a helpful and convenient set of future CSS features beyond the current stable client CSS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Next and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Less - Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Less runs on both the server-side (with Node. js and Rhino) or client-side (modern browsers only).

Rework - Let's Make Work Better. Research, ideas, and practices from Google and others, to put people first.