Software Alternatives & Reviews

Coveralls VS Phabricator

Compare Coveralls VS Phabricator and see what are their differences

Coveralls logo Coveralls

Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator
  • Coveralls Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-24
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Coveralls

Categories
  • Code Coverage
  • Code Quality
  • Code Analysis
  • Code Review
Website coveralls.io
Pricing URL Official Coveralls Pricing
Details $

Phabricator

Categories
  • Code Collaboration
  • Project Management
  • Git
  • Code Coverage
Website phacility.com
Pricing URL-
Details $

Coveralls videos

High Quality Mens Work Clothing Long Sleeve Coveralls review

More videos:

  • Review - Scentlok coveralls review!

Phabricator videos

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Coveralls and Phabricator)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Coveralls and Phabricator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coveralls should be more popular than Phabricator. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Coveralls mentions (13)

  • GitHub Actions for Perl Development
    Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Perl Testing in 2023
    I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • free-for.dev
    Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Containers for Coverage
    Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Comprehensive coverage Jest+Playwright in Next.js TS
    This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Coveralls and Phabricator, you can also consider the following products

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.