Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | common-lisp.net |
Details $ | - |
Categories |
|
---|---|
Website | julialang.org |
Details $ |
Based on our record, Julia seems to be a lot more popular than Common Lisp. While we know about 114 links to Julia, we've tracked only 11 mentions of Common Lisp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The yin-yang logo with lambdas was designed by Guy Steele, and he has granted permission for its use to Common Lisp Foundation (the entity which runs common-lisp.net website and the gitlab.common-lisp.net repo). Source: about 1 year ago
A wiki and pm tool I personally like a lot, simple, lightweight, is trac but there is no free hosting available — but I could work on hosting on AWS for instance. MoinMoin is also a good and simple wiki. You are using Medium a lot, which could also be a sensible option but it is more a publishing platform than a collaborative platform. Gitlab is also a popular choice I believe and we could use the instance on... Source: over 1 year ago
Does anybody have information how the content on common-lisp.net is handled? Source: about 2 years ago
Any insight into the current down-time for common-lisp.net? Source: about 2 years ago
Python seems like a popular option these days and it is different enough from C++ in that it may teach you to think about programming in a different way. You could also try a functional language such as Lisp, Scheme) or Haskell -- they too will make you think differently about programming. Source: about 2 years ago
I'm really not fond of that agpt landing page. So many red flags; the AI-generated background, mailing letter box with accompanying email-beggar text, the Discord button (!!!) being given as much space as the Github repo click-through... it's a mess. The whole website feels more boilerplate than content. I mean, look at these quotes! > With the help of the incredible open-source community, we’re making... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I’m wondering if there are any attempts for a ROS2 client library for Julia(lang)? I very much like the concepts of Julia and would like to use it in my robotics applications. I believe, that writing code in Julia is very efficient and productive. As a robotics engineer and researcher, I would definitively appreciate the possibility to use ROS2 with Julia. Source: 8 months ago
Kevin is a senior research scientist (read: fancy postdoc) at Wellesley College. He has a PhD in immunology, but transitioned to microbial genomics after graduate school, and now spends most of his time writing code (ask me about julia). His first postdoc was looking at the microbes that grow on the outer surface of cheese (it's a cool model system for studying microbial communities - here's the paper) and now... Source: 9 months ago
Julia is a great alternative in terms of raw speed/performance (not a compatible language). Source: 10 months ago
If you are really committed to running on Apple hardware then take a look at Tensorflow for macOS. Another option is the Julia programming language which has very basic Metal support at a CUDA-like level. FluxML would be the ML framework in Julia. I’m not sure either option will be painless or let you do everything you could do with a Nvidia GPU. Source: 11 months ago
C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation
Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.
GNU Octave - GNU Octave is a programming language for scientific computing.
F# - F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.
MATLAB - A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming