Software Alternatives & Reviews

CMU Common Lisp VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare CMU Common Lisp VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

CMU Common Lisp logo CMU Common Lisp

CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
CMU Common Lisp Landing Page
CMU Common Lisp Landing Page
Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing Page
Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing Page

CMU Common Lisp details

Categories
IDE Programming Language Text Editor
Website cons.org  

Steel Bank Common Lisp details

Categories
IDE Programming Language Text Editor
Website sbcl.org  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
44
44%
56%
56
43
43%
57%
57
45
45%
55%
55
33
33%
67%
67

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMU Common Lisp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMU Common Lisp yet. Tracking of CMU Common Lisp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (2)

  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. - Source: Reddit / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Clozure Common Lisp - Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Armed Bear Common Lisp - Armed Bear Common Lisp (ABCL) is a full implementation of the Common Lisp language featuring both...

ManKai Common Lisp - ManKai Common Lisp (MKCL) aims to be a full implementation of the Common Lisp language in...

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.

User reviews

Share your experience with using CMU Common Lisp and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with