Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Cloud Cannon. While we know about 353 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 23 mentions of Cloud Cannon. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Solutions like CloudCanon or TinaCMS use this approach. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Great news — active development of Eleventy will continue, with Git-based CMS CloudCannon supporting the project and Zach taking a Developer Advocate job there. (Also 'Project Slipstream' sounds cool, from a static web perspective — removing less popular template syntax from core and moving to plugins.). Source: 9 months ago
A Git-based CMS like CloudCannon takes a different approach. It syncs your files from your repository and provides an editing interface to update the content. When you save a file, the CMS commits it back to the repository, so you always maintain control and ownership over your content. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Because I use CloudCannon to manage content on the sites I create, and because our product developers have been so busy over the last year, I’ve been able to put a much wider range of SSGs through their paces than I’d thought would be possible, working both locally and through CloudCannon’s web interface. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Thank you, this was helpful! We started looking at Cloudcannon and it seems well enough for what we need. Source: over 1 year ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Forestry.io - A simple CMS for Jekyll and Hugo sites.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
VuePress - A static site generator by Vue.js 🛠️
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.
Sanity.io - Sanity.io a platform for structured content that comes with an open-source editor that you can customize with React.js.
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.