Checkly VS MockServer

With risk of tooting my own horn too much, this is exactly why I started my company https://checklyhq.com We approach it a bit different: we blur the lines between E2E testing and production monitoring. You run an E2E test and promote it to a monitor that runs around the clock. It's quite powerful. Just an E2E test that logs into your production environment after deploy and then every 10 minutes will catch a ton... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Headless Recorder from Checkly might be a cool addition and it supports Playwright and Puppeteer 🙌. Source: over 1 year ago

Checklyhq.com - Checkly is the API & E2E monitoring platform for the modern stack: programmable, flexible and loving JavaScript. Generous free tier for devs. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

At FINN we use Checkly once again to run our scheduled E2E tests. Some teams also use a combination of Make and Apify to run scheduled E2E tests on smaller projects. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

This is a good area that needs to be fleshed out, so far the best solution I've found is https://checklyhq.com/ Playwright as a service + other monitoring checks is amazing. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

The open-source examples are mockoon, mock-server.com, etc. Source: 11 months ago

I've just found out MockServer and it looks awesome 🤩 so I wanted to check it out repeating the steps of my previous demo WireMock Testing which (as you can expect) uses WireMock, another fantastic tool to mock APIs. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

I tend to use MockServer. With MockServer you can define inputs, so you can say that the request should look like this with that URL, etc etc. That way you can verify that the request looks okay. Source: about 2 years ago