Software Alternatives & Reviews

Buildbot VS PeakFlow

Compare Buildbot VS PeakFlow and see what are their differences

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework

PeakFlow logo PeakFlow

Continuous integration build testing and error reporting for developers.
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • PeakFlow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27

Buildbot videos

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

PeakFlow videos

No PeakFlow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buildbot and PeakFlow)
Continuous Integration
90 90%
10% 10
DevOps Tools
89 89%
11% 11
Continuous Deployment
89 89%
11% 11
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Buildbot and PeakFlow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

PeakFlow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PeakFlow yet. Tracking of PeakFlow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buildbot and PeakFlow, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs

Buildkite - Buildkite is a platform for running fast, secure, and scalable continuous integration pipelines on your own infrastructure.