Buildbot VS Laminar

Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago

If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago

Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago

I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Delve into Laminar would be my suggestion. Source: over 2 years ago

I like Laminar as a lightweight, self-hosted CI solution. Source: over 2 years ago

For a lightweight solution, I like to recommend Laminar CI. Source: over 2 years ago

Laminar is a lightweight and modular CI system licensed under GPLv3. I like that it allows me to build the CI solution that fits my given use case the best. Source: over 2 years ago

I find Laminar quite interesting in this space. It might help you too to build your own lightweight CI solution that does exactly what your use case requires. Source: almost 3 years ago