Software Alternatives & Reviews

Buck VS GNU Make

Compare Buck VS GNU Make and see what are their differences

Buck logo Buck

A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
  • Buck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

Buck videos

Buck HONEST Operator Review | Rainbow Six Siege

More videos:

  • Review - Unbreakable Pocket Knife Destruction Test - Buck 110 review
  • Review - Buck 110 review after carrying for 9 years

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buck and GNU Make)
Front End Package Manager
JS Build Tools
30 30%
70% 70
Development
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using Buck and GNU Make. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buck mentions (8)

  • Compiling a single-file app with csc.dll
    We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago
  • Just: A Command Runner
    Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Dev Discussions: Everything You Need to Know about Monorepos with Juri Strumpflohner of Nrwl
    Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Using URLs for dependency management
    Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is it possible to be an android developer ONLY with the documentation?
    That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buck and GNU Make, you can also consider the following products

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

MakeMe - Building Software Made Simple

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.