Software Alternatives & Reviews

BeeGFS VS Seaweed FS

Compare BeeGFS VS Seaweed FS and see what are their differences

BeeGFS logo BeeGFS

  Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Seaweed FS logo Seaweed FS

SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…
  • BeeGFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05
  • Seaweed FS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-10

BeeGFS videos

BeeGFS High Availability Features with Built in Monitoring - Oriol Mula Valls, HPCNow!

More videos:

  • Review - Transtec: Delivering BeeGFS for High Performance Computing
  • Review - Hussein N. Harake (CSCS) - Evaluation of BeeGFS parallel filesystem

Seaweed FS videos

No Seaweed FS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BeeGFS and Seaweed FS)
Cloud Storage
39 39%
61% 61
Storage
57 57%
43% 43
Cloud Computing
37 37%
63% 63
File Sharing
22 22%
78% 78

User comments

Share your experience with using BeeGFS and Seaweed FS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BeeGFS and Seaweed FS

BeeGFS Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
BeeGFS is a hardware-independent POSIX parallel file system (a.k.a Software-defined Parallel Storage) developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for ease of use, simple installation, and management. BeeGFS is created on an Available Source development model (source code is publicly available), offering a self-supported Community Edition and a fully supported...

Seaweed FS Reviews

We have no reviews of Seaweed FS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Seaweed FS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BeeGFS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BeeGFS yet. Tracking of BeeGFS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Seaweed FS mentions (35)

  • Show HN: OpenSign – The open source alternative to DocuSign
    > Theoretically they could swap with minio but last time we used it it was not a drop-in replacement yet. Depends on whether AGPL v3 works for you or not (or whether you decide to pay them), I guess: https://min.io/pricing I've actually been looking for more open alternatives, but haven't found much. Zenko CloudServer seemed to be somewhat promising, but doesn't seem to be managed very actively:... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • The Tailscale Universal Docker Mod
    Wireguard + GUI: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy Backups of mail accounts: https://www.offlineimap.org Cloud storage for phones: http://nextcloud.com Mirroring podcasts locally: https://github.com/akhilrex/podgrab My own matrix instance: https://matrix-org.github.io/dendrite/ Backups: https://restic.net Media Management: https://jellyfin.org Relay only tor help: https://www.torproject.org S3 compatible storage:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Google Cloud Storage FUSE
    JuiceFS is mostly POSIX compatible, but there are important caveats to that like no ACL, copying files changes their mtime (which impacts backup tools), has "close-to-open" consistency (which makes it dangerous for log appenders). Choosing an appropriate solution in this space still depends on what you need to do with the storage, and some options are MooseFS https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs, Curve... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • My Experience Self Hosting
    Supabase-Storage uses an S3 compatible API and is ultimately just middleware for it. So, the redundancy would be at the storage backend systems. Seems like the majority of s3 compatible selfhosted systems are built for redundancy/high-availability. With only a brief read of docs, and in no particular order: Https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/quick-start/ Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs CEPH... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Open source cloud file system. Posix, HDFS and S3 compatible
    Adopted SeaweedFS few months back. Never looked back since then. It's fast even on HDD disks. https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs#introduction. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BeeGFS and Seaweed FS, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

MooseFS - MooseFS is a fault tolerant, network distributed file system.

WekaFS - WekaFS is an extreme-performance parallel filesystem for Linux from WekaIO that works in AWS or on-prem on Industry-Standard Servers. WekaFS includes Enterprise features such as snapshots and tiering to S3 Object Stores.

LizardFS - LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system.